AI GUARDIAN

The board wants AI in your business apps. Your IT team is stuck between lock-in and a 12-month build.

The pressure is real. But the options are bad: pay $30 per user per month for a copilot that locks you into one vendor's models and one vendor's cloud, or spend 6 to 12 months building a custom pipeline your engineers don't have time for. Meanwhile, employees are pasting company data into browser-based chat tools with no governance, no audit trail, and no idea what left the building.

European-origin software trusted by enterprises in financial services, insurance, and the public sector. Deployed on-premises, in private clouds, and as SaaS across regulated industries.


From AI ambition to governed AI in production

Six steps, from connecting your repositories to scaling across use cases with no incremental engineering cost.

1
Connect to your content where it lives
No migration. AI grounded in your actual documents.
add

Link to your existing repositories: FlowerDocs, Alfresco, Nuxeo, SharePoint, S3, or custom sources. No migration required. AI works grounded in your actual documents, not generic internet data, so every response is traceable to a real source in your environment.

check_circleWorks with your ECM stack as-is
2
Pick the right model for each task
8+ providers. Switch in config, not code.
add

Connect to OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Gemini, Bedrock, or self-hosted models via Ollama. Swap providers in configuration, not in code. No per-seat licensing. Use a European model for sensitive content and a powerful external model for everything else, in the same workflow.

check_circleNo per-seat AI tax
3
Embed AI into your existing applications
Web components and REST APIs. Integration in weeks.
add

Surface AI capabilities where your users already work: copilots in business portals, search in case management, automated classification in intake workflows. Drop-in web components and a complete REST API mean integration takes weeks, not months, and your users never leave the applications they know.

check_circleWeeks to first users, not months
4
Govern, audit, and stay compliant
Every AI interaction logged. Human validation built in.
add

Define what AI can access, what operations it can perform, and when a human needs to validate the output. Every AI interaction is logged. Role-based access control and tenant isolation are built in. Swap a non-compliant model without rebuilding your application. Built for EU AI Act Article 14 requirements.

check_circleEU AI Act compliant from day one

A platform your teams actually use

Four capabilities in one governed surface: an AI copilot grounded in your documents, multi-model orchestration with sovereign routing, full compliance audit trails, and zero-migration connectors to your existing repositories. Click the tabs to explore each module.

person
Marie Laurent
Compliance Admin
Copilot All Systems Operational
Fri 13 Mar 2026
smart_toy
Contextual Business Copilot
AI assistant grounded in your enterprise knowledge base
folder FlowerDocs chevron_right Compliance Library chevron_right GDPR Framework check_circle Indexed shield Sovereign

GDPR Data Retention Policy v3.2

Last modified: 14 Mar 2025 : Classification: Internal : Owner: Legal & Compliance

4.1 General Retention Principles. All personal data processed by the organization shall be retained only for the minimum period necessary to fulfil the purpose for which it was collected, unless a longer retention period is required by applicable law.

4.2 Financial Records Exemption. In accordance with GDPR Article 17(3)(b), financial records containing personal data shall be retained for a minimum of seven (7) years from the date of the relevant transaction.

warning Note: Cross-border transactions may require extended retention per ECB supervisory guidelines (see Annex B).

4.3 Automated Deletion. Upon expiry of the applicable retention period, personal data shall be securely deleted using approved sanitization methods.

auto_awesome
Uxopian Copilot
What is our current policy on GDPR data retention for financial records?
auto_awesome GPT-4o via Sovereign Router
Based on your internal documentation, financial records must be retained for a minimum of 7 years under GDPR Article 17(3)(b), which provides an exemption from the right to erasure for legal compliance obligations.
description GDPR-Policy-v3.2.pdf 4.2 98% description Finance-Retention-Guide.docx p.12 94%
Can you cross-reference this with the latest ECB guidelines?
auto_awesome Mistral Large via FlowerDocs RAG
The ECB's SSM Supervisory Manual (2024 update) aligns with your policy. It specifies that significant institutions must maintain audit trails for a minimum of 5 years, with a recommended extension to 7 years for cross-border transactions.
description ECB-SSM-Manual-2024.pdf Ch.8 96% description GDPR-Policy-v3.2.pdf 4.2 98%
account_tree
Multi-Model Orchestration
9 providers, zero lock-in, sovereign routing
warning
ICT Concentration Risk Mitigation
DORA Art. 28: Reduce dependency on single ICT third-party providers
verified_user DORA Compliant
layers Connected Providers
cloud
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Cloud120msSOC 2
public
Mistral AI
Mistral Large
Cloud95msGDPR
dns
Ollama
Llama 3.1 70B
On-Prem180msSovereign
memory
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Cloud110msSOC 2
cloud
Azure OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Cloud130msGDPR
dns
vLLM
Mixtral 8x22B
On-Prem160msSovereign
alt_route Routing Logic
lock
If Content is classified as Sensitive
→ Route to local Ollama instance
Sovereign
public
If User locale is EU
→ Prefer EU-hosted models (Mistral, Azure EU)
GDPR
speed
If Latency budget < 100ms
→ Route to fastest available provider
Performance
savings
If Task is low complexity
→ Use cost-optimized model
Cost
verified_user
Compliance & Audit Timeline
Full traceability of every AI interaction
Total Interactions
1,847
+124 today
Human Validated
94.2%
Above threshold
Sovereign Processed
38.1%
Sensitive content
Avg. Audit Score
9.6/10
Last 30 days
11:23 AM low risk
Policy query: GDPR data retention for financial records
GPT-4o check_circle approved verified_user Art. 14
11:18 AM high risk
Sensitive document classification: Board minutes Q4 2024
Ollama (Llama 3.1 70B) check_circle approved verified_user Art. 14
10:55 AM low risk
Contract summarization: Vendor SLA agreement with CloudTech
Mistral Large check auto-approved verified_user Art. 14
10:30 AM medium risk
Multi-lingual translation: Client communication (FR, EN, DE)
Mistral Large schedule pending verified_user Art. 14
electrical_services
"No-Migration" Connector Wizard
Connect to your repositories in-place, zero data movement
link
Connect In-Place Architecture
Uxopian connects directly to your existing document repositories. Your data never moves, is never copied, and remains under your full sovereignty. AI models index and query documents through secure, read-only connectors.
inventory_2
check_circle Connected
FlowerDocs
Enterprise Content Management
Documents indexed48,291
cloud_upload
check_circle Connected
Alfresco
Document Management
Documents indexed31,847
share
sync Indexing
SharePoint
Microsoft 365 Integration
Live Indexing67%
Processing documents without migration...
cloud_queue
Available
Amazon S3
Cloud Object Storage
folder_open
check_circle Connected
Nuxeo
Content Services Platform
Documents indexed22,103
hard_drive
Available
Google Drive
Cloud Document Storage
3
Total Connected
repositories
102,241
Documents Indexed
across all sources
1
Currently Indexing
in progress
0 bytes
Data Moved
sovereign by design

Built for EU AI Act, GDPR, and DORA compliance

Click each regulation to see what it means for your deployment.

gavel

EU AI Act high-risk obligations take effect August 2026

If your business applications use AI to classify, route, or make decisions involving people, you need human oversight, transparent logic, and an audit trail for every AI-assisted decision. Fines reach EUR 35M or 7% of global turnover.

warning

Shadow AI grows every day you don't offer an alternative

61% of European CIOs plan to increase reliance on local AI providers (Gartner 2025). Until IT provides a governed, accessible tool inside existing applications, employees keep pasting data into uncontrolled browser tools.

The window to differentiate is now. Only 19% of organizations have AI in production. Those that ship governed AI this year don't just get better tools: they get a defensible lead over the 49% still planning.


Where organizations stand today

0%
Considering AI for content management but have not started (Archimag ECM Barometer 2025)
0%
Prefer selecting their own AI models with governance control over vendor-bundled AI (Archimag 2025)
0%
Of European CIOs plan to increase reliance on local AI providers over global hyperscalers (Gartner 2025)

What runs behind every integration

Your applications

Case management

Portals

ECMs

Custom apps

↓ Embeddable web components and REST APIs
AI orchestration

Uxopian AI

Goal-based orchestration, RAG, SSE streaming, function calling, governance, audit

↓ Content and model access
Connectors

FlowerDocs

Alfresco / Nuxeo

SharePoint / S3

Custom sources

↓ 8+ LLM providers
Model providers

OpenAI / Azure OpenAI

Anthropic / Mistral

Gemini / Bedrock

Ollama (self-hosted)


You have options. Here's how they compare.

What matters Uxopian Cloud AI copilot Enterprise search Custom build
Content integration Deep ECM connectors, metadata-aware. Works with your repositories, not alongside them. Generic storage connectors. Assembly required. 100+ app connectors but standalone. Cannot embed into your apps. Custom per project. 6-12 months to production.
Model choice 8+ providers. Switch in config. Self-host via Ollama. No per-seat fee. Primarily own ecosystem. Azure means OpenAI. Bedrock means AWS. Single model or vendor-proprietary. Any model, but integration is your responsibility.
Governance and compliance Access control, audit logging, human-in-the-loop, EU AI Act-ready today. Basic logging. Governance is platform-centric. Limited. SaaS-only raises GDPR and sovereignty concerns. Custom build required. $200K-$500K+ initial investment.
Runs on your infrastructure On-prem, private cloud, or SaaS. Self-host models via Ollama. European-origin. Vendor cloud required. Hybrid options still vendor-dependent. Mostly SaaS-only. Any infrastructure, but you build and maintain everything.
Cost model Predictable licensing. No per-seat AI tax. No credit systems. $30/user/month. No model choice. No on-prem option. ~$50/user/month. $60K+ annual minimums. $200K-$500K+ to build. Ongoing engineering maintenance.
Embeds into your apps Web components, REST API with OpenAPI 3.1.0, SSE streaming. Drop-in copilot UIs. SDK available but significant custom development needed. Standalone products. Not designed to embed. Maximum flexibility, but months of engineering per integration.

The gap between "we should do AI" and "we have AI in production"

lock

The per-seat tax that locks you in

The obvious choice is to add your cloud vendor's copilot, at $30 per user per month. That means their models, their cloud, their rules. You can't swap providers, run it on your own infrastructure, or choose a European model for sensitive content.

hourglass_empty

The custom build that never ships

Your architects scoped a custom pipeline: RAG, vector databases, prompt engineering, a governance layer. The estimate came back at 6 to 12 months and $200K to $500K before a single user reaches production. The board wanted results this quarter.

warning

Shadow AI is already happening

While IT debates architecture, employees have already found their solution. They copy contract clauses, customer data, and internal memos into browser-based chat tools. No access controls. No audit trail. No way to know what data left the building.

bar_chart_4_bars

Half the market is stuck in the same place

49% of organizations are considering AI for content management but haven't started. Only 19% have anything in production. The gap isn't ambition, it's a lack of a governed path from idea to deployment that doesn't take a year or lock you in.


Stop choosing between lock-in and a 12-month build