You need documents viewed, stored, processed, maybe enriched. That is 6 to 12 months of engineering on something that is not your core product. Your customers in Europe are asking about data sovereignty. Your roadmap is already behind. You should not have to become a content management company to ship a SaaS product.
Six modular capabilities. Use one or all. Each ships under your brand, deploys on your terms, and integrates in days rather than months.
Every component is fully white-labeled. Your customers see your product, not a third-party logo. OEM licensing is built for SaaS economics: per-tenant, per-volume, or platform-level. One contract covers everything, with licensing that scales cleanly as your business grows.
Every Uxopian component supports full white-label theming via CSS custom properties. Swap brand colors, logos, and toolbar layouts with a single configuration object.
Document viewing, content storage, processing, migration, or all of them. Each capability works independently. Use one building block or the full set. You pay for what you use and ship what your product actually needs. No platform lock-in, no unused modules billing you every month.
REST APIs with OpenAPI specs. Iframe embedding for the viewer. Web components for drop-in features. Everything is documented with Swagger. Your team integrates in days, not months. No proprietary SDKs, no framework lock-in, no black boxes your team has to maintain years later.
On their infrastructure. In your private cloud. In a European data center. Or as SaaS. The same code runs everywhere. Sovereignty becomes a feature you offer, not a problem you explain away. When your prospect in banking or government asks where their data lives, you have a real answer.
When customers switch to your platform, their old documents come with them. Visual migration workflows with 15+ connectors turn weeks of onboarding into days. Each new customer arrives with their full history intact. That is a sales and retention advantage your competitors cannot replicate.
Fast2 replaces the traditional "write a migration script, test, fail, rewrite" cycle with a drag-and-drop canvas. Connect source, configure transforms, map to destination. What used to take weeks now runs in hours.
Classification, extraction, multi-model routing. Intelligent document features available as API calls. Connect them to your workflow or use them standalone. No ML team required. No model training infrastructure to maintain. Your product gets AI capabilities the same way it gets storage: through an API call.
Point our extraction pipeline at any document: invoices, trade finance contracts, insurance claims. The system routes each field to the optimal model and outputs structured JSON your app can consume immediately.
Each Uxopian building block ships as a standalone Web Component or iframe. Click them from the palette to embed into a SaaS interface, no full-suite lock-in.
Each Uxopian building block ships as a standalone Web Component or iframe. Click them from the palette to embed into your own SaaS interface: the viewer, the metadata panel, the extraction widget. They embed natively, no full-suite lock-in.
Frontend + business logic
Self-service UI
Backend services
Content storage, multi-tenant, schema-free
250+ formats, annotation, white-label
Classification, extraction, multi-model
Migration, 15+ connectors, visual builder
Orchestration, routing, approval chains
Deploy on-premises, in your private cloud, or as SaaS. European-origin software. Your customers' data stays on their infrastructure.
You need a document viewer that handles more than PDFs. You need storage with metadata. You need processing pipelines. Maybe search. Maybe classification. Each one is a project. Together, they are a year of work and $200K to $500K before you have shipped a single feature your customers actually asked for.
schedule6 to 12 months of pure infrastructureOne vendor for viewing. Another for storage. A third for processing. A fourth for search. Four contracts, four integration points, four support channels. When something breaks between them, nobody owns the problem. Your team becomes the integration layer.
device_hubYour engineers become the glue layerWhere does their data live? Can it stay on their infrastructure? Is the vendor US-headquartered? If you are using a cloud-only platform from a US provider, the answer to sovereignty is no. And your prospects in banking, government, and healthcare notice every time.
gpp_badLost deals in banking, government, healthcareYour product manager wants intelligent document features. Your customers want faster onboarding from legacy systems. But your engineering team is still maintaining the document viewer they built two years ago. Every sprint spent on infrastructure is a sprint not spent on what makes your product different.
trending_downRoadmap slippage every quarterContent storage, document viewing, intelligent processing, workflow orchestration, and migration tooling. All pre-integrated. All API-first. No other vendor offers all five as embeddable, OEM-ready building blocks. You stop being the integration layer between four vendors and start shipping features.
Built in Europe. Deployable on-premises, in your customer's cloud, or as SaaS. Multi-tenant isolation with per-tenant data boundaries. When your prospect in banking or government asks where their data lives, you have a real answer. Not a roadmap item.
One contract covers everything. Most of your competitors are managing 3 to 5 vendor relationships to replicate what this platform provides out of the box. That is 3 to 5 points of failure, 3 to 5 renewal cycles, and 3 to 5 integration layers your team has to maintain indefinitely.
| What matters | Uxopian | Content Platforms | Viewing SDKs | Build in-house |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to ship | Weeks. Pre-integrated, embeddable building blocks. | Weeks, but cloud-only and vendor-branded | Moderate for viewing only. Storage, processing, and migration come from elsewhere. | 6 to 12 months. $200K to $500K before you ship anything. |
| Full capability set | All five capabilities, one vendor, one integration | Limited to vendor's own storage. No processing or migration tooling. | PDF viewing only. You assemble 3 to 5 vendors for everything else. | Separate projects per capability. Your team becomes the integration layer. |
| White-label and OEM | Fully white-label. Ship under your brand. OEM licensing for SaaS economics. | Vendor branding visible in embedded components | True OEM for viewing, but viewing only | Full control, but you build and maintain everything |
| Data sovereignty | On-prem, your cloud, customer's cloud, or SaaS. European-origin. | Cloud-only, US-headquartered. No on-prem option. | Client-side available. No server-side content management. | Full control, but the operational burden is yours alone. |
| Customer migration | Visual migration workflows, 15+ connectors, days instead of weeks | Typically absent. Migration is a services engagement. | Not available | Custom scripts per customer. Weeks of professional services each time. |
| Licensing model | Per-tenant, volume-based, or platform licensing | Per-API-call pricing that gets unpredictable at scale | Per-distribution OEM license, custom pricing | Engineering headcount cost, ongoing maintenance |
See how a 30-minute demo maps to your specific platform, your deployment model, and your licensing needs.