ACCELERATED MIGRATION

You need a better ECM.
Migrating millions of documents shouldn’t be the obstacle

The vendor raised prices again. Support is ending. Your team knows the system needs to go, but nobody wants to be responsible for losing metadata, breaking permissions, or dropping version histories. So the old system stays, and the risk grows every quarter.

drag_indicator
Fast2 — Workflow Orchestration Builder
sensors125/S
folder_shared
SharePoint
Source
inventory_2
FileNet P8
Source
description
Documentum
Source
scanner
OCR Engine
Tesseract
transform
Binary Conv
PDF/A
assignment_turned_in
Meta Remap
15k Rules
security
Virus Scan
ClamAV
policy
PII Masking
Compliance
move_to_inbox
FlowerDocs
Injection

What runs behind this

Fast2 is a broker-worker migration engine. The broker orchestrates and persists state. Workers execute in parallel. Add workers to increase throughput. Remove them to throttle. Every document goes through a visual workflow you can inspect, modify, and replay.

Source systems

Documentum

FileNet

SharePoint

Lotus Notes

OpenText

Alfresco

S3 / Cloud

SQL / CSV

arrow_downward Ingestion
Migration engine
Fast2 — Broker / Worker Console
● Live
Broker Command Center
FileNet → FlowerDocs · Migration Job #4012
6 Workers Active
Global Migration Progress 400,000,000 / 750,000,000 53.3%
Worker 1
22/s
docs / sec
FileNet Batch 12–401
Worker 2
18/s
docs / sec
FileNet Batch 12–402
Worker 3
25/s
docs / sec
FileNet Batch 12–403
Worker 4
9/s
docs / sec
Retry · Batch 12–388
Worker 5
21/s
docs / sec
FileNet Batch 12–404
Worker 6
idle
Waiting for batch…
4,012
Batches done
0
Errors
19h
ETA remaining
95/s
Total throughput

Fast2 (Broker + Workers)

Visual workflow builder · metadata transformation · parallelization · per-document audit trails · checkpoint-restart

The broker orchestrates and persists state. Workers execute in parallel. Add workers to increase throughput. Remove them to throttle. Every document goes through a visual workflow you can inspect, modify, and replay.

arrow_downward Output
Target platforms

FlowerDocs

Alfresco

Nuxeo

S3 / Cloud Storage

Deployed in your environment. European-origin software. Your data never leaves your infrastructure during migration.


The daily reality of being stuck on a legacy ECM

receipt_long
The renewal letter arrives and the number keeps going up
Documentum, FileNet, OpenText licence costs rising every cycle
expand_more

Documentum maintenance costs more every year. FileNet licensing does not get cheaper. You are paying a premium for a system your team complains about, but the alternative, migrating everything, sounds worse than the invoice. So you sign the renewal and push the problem to next year's budget.

trending_upLicence cost increasing every cycle
hourglass_disabled
The migration estimate came back at 18 months and $2M
Custom scripting, consultants on-site, shelved budgets
expand_more

You asked a systems integrator to scope the migration. They quoted a custom project: discovery workshops, custom scripts, manual validation, consultants on-site for a year. The number was so high that leadership shelved the project. Now you are stuck waiting for a budget cycle that never comes.

money_offProjects deferred year after year
lock_open
What about the metadata? The permissions? The versions?
15 years of layered structures, 10,000-version files, undocumented logic
expand_more

Your ECM holds 15 years of documents. Some files have 10,000+ versions. Folder structures map to business logic nobody documented. Permissions are layered, inherited, and partially manual. If you move this and something breaks, you will not know until an auditor or a lawsuit surfaces it.

verified_userAudit liability if anything is lost
warning
The old system is one bad day away from a real incident
Unpatched OS, lost admin knowledge, no documented recovery procedure
expand_more

The server runs on an OS version that stopped getting patches. The person who knew how to administer it left two years ago. When it goes down, it takes half a day to bring back up because nobody remembers the procedure. Everyone knows this is a risk. Nothing happens anyway.

crisis_alertOperational risk: critical

From "we cannot afford to move" to "it is already running"

Every step is designed to let your team maintain control, verify results at each stage, and scale up only when you are confident nothing was lost.

1
Start small and prove it works before scaling
Pick a subset: one department, one document type, one cabinet. Run a pilot migration. Check the metadata, verify the permissions, confirm the versions transferred correctly. When it checks out, scale up.
2
Metadata and permissions come with the documents
Fast2 transforms metadata during migration: remapping folder structures to taxonomies, normalizing field names, enriching inconsistent attributes. Permissions carry over. Version histories stay intact.
3
Your team runs it, not consultants
Uxopian trains your people to operate the migration tool. Visual workflow builder, real-time dashboards, and per-document audit trails. One institution's teams now run migrations independently across 60+ business units.
4
If it crashes, you pick up where you left off
Checkpoint-restart is built into the architecture. If a server goes down or a network hiccup interrupts a batch, the system resumes from the exact document where it stopped. No re-running the whole job.
5
Every document is tracked, from source to target
Per-document traceability stored in an internal database. When someone asks "can you prove nothing was lost," you show them the reconciliation report, not a spreadsheet someone maintained manually.
Fast2 — Migration Reconciliation Report
✓ Zero Loss
Batch 4,012 · Audit Report
Batch
#4,012
Docs processed
100,000
Errors
0
MD5 Matched
100,000
Source · IBM FileNet
P8
001
contract_2024_NDA_Bilateral.pdf
MD5
002
invoice_Q3_2024_Nexara.pdf
MD5
003
patient_record_4821_MRI.dcm
MD5
004
regulatory_decree_2024-441.pdf
MD5
005
mortgage_file_BNP_2024.pdf
MD5
Target · FlowerDocs
ECM
001
contract_2024_NDA_Bilateral.pdf
MD5
002
invoice_Q3_2024_Nexara.pdf
MD5
003
patient_record_4821_MRI.dcm
MD5
004
regulatory_decree_2024-441.pdf
MD5
005
mortgage_file_BNP_2024.pdf
MD5

The window to move is smaller than you think

Two deadlines are forcing the conversation that has been postponed for years. Hover or tap each card to see the full picture.

schedule October 2026 deadline
SharePoint Server 2016: end of extended support
Extended support ends in months. No more security patches. Organizations in regulated industries need a sovereign destination before the clock runs out.
flip_to_back Hover or tap to see the full impact
What happens after October 2026

After extended support ends, there will be no security patches, no bug fixes, and no compliance updates. For organizations in banking, insurance, or government, running an unpatched document platform is not a theoretical risk, it is a compliance failure waiting to happen.

BSI (Germany's Federal Office for Information Security) has recommended organizations evaluate SharePoint alternatives. Moving to Microsoft 365 means your data goes to Microsoft's cloud. For many organizations in regulated industries, that is not acceptable. The migration path to a sovereign platform needs to start now to be completed in time.

crisis_alert Sovereign platform required for regulated data
monitoring Archimag ECM Barometer 2025
33% of organizations still run end-of-life ECM tools
A third of organizations depend on ECM systems that are end-of-life or unmaintained, yet still hold business-critical records that regulators and auditors will ask about.
flip_to_back Hover or tap to see the full impact
What running on an unsupported platform actually means

Every month on an unsupported system increases the risk of security incidents, compliance gaps, and data loss that you cannot recover from. These are findings from independent research across European organizations, not warnings from a vendor trying to sell a project.

The cost of waiting is not zero. Every quarter on a legacy platform is another quarter of licence fees, another quarter of security risk, and another quarter of migration complexity as the source data grows. The organizations that started early are now running autonomously.

security Security and compliance risk, compounding monthly

The cost of waiting is not zero. Every quarter on a legacy platform is another quarter of licence fees, another quarter of security risk, and another quarter of migration complexity as the source data grows. The organizations that started early are now running autonomously. Those that waited are still in discovery workshops.


You have options. Here is how they compare.

Most migration tools are built for one-time projects with a defined end date. Fast2 is built for organizations that need to run migration programs at scale, repeatedly, without consultant dependency.

What matters Uxopian (Fast2) migration-center (fme) Xillio AvePoint Systems integrator
Per-document traceability from source to target Yes. Every transformation logged. Crash-proof persistence with resume from exact failure point. Basic logging. Designed primarily for one-time migrations. Insights module for analysis. Incremental via Link Redirector. Audit logs for SharePoint targets only. Depends on the SI's methodology. Typically manual reconciliation.
Metadata and permissions survive the move 15,000+ transformation rules in production. Handles 10,000+ versions per file. Enrichment and harmonization during migration. 250+ connectors with broad field mapping. No AI-assisted transformation. 60+ connectors. Lighter transformation, limited rule depth. Basic field mapping for Microsoft ecosystem targets only. Custom development per project. Expensive and not repeatable.
Your team runs it without ongoing consultant dependency Training-to-autonomy model. One financial institution's teams now run migrations independently across 60+ business units. Services-dependent delivery model. Professional services-oriented. High-speed for SharePoint. Not designed for ECM-to-ECM at scale. You are paying consultants for the duration. Typically $500K to $5M+ per program.
Proven at hundreds of millions of documents 750M+ documents proven. 80 docs/sec sustained. Broker-worker architecture scales horizontally. Large-volume capable. 2,100+ projects completed. 250+ companies served. Mid-scale focus. High-speed for SharePoint. Not designed for cross-ECM scale. Depends on what they build. Typically slow and expensive at volume.
Data stays in your infrastructure during migration Deployed in your environment. European-built software. Data never leaves your network. On-premises tooling. German-headquartered. Dutch-headquartered. European deployment. Cloud SaaS. Data transits vendor infrastructure. Runs in your environment, but consultants have access to your data.

What happened after deployment

These numbers come from production deployments at financial institutions and regulatory bodies, not benchmarks or lab conditions.

750M
Documents being migrated at one of the world's largest financial institutions, with 400M done in the first 15 months
80/s
Documents per second sustained throughput, scaling horizontally by adding workers to the broker architecture
0
Documents lost when a European financial regulator migrated 50M documents from 30 Lotus cabinets with 15,000+ transformation rules

Stop paying for a system you want to leave